Reading Report
Accountability time for all! I have been doing ok the past couple months. Of course, I'm the first to admit i watch too much TV and don't read enough... May God give us all more discipline this summer for His glory!
Let me suggest to you a book that i just finished reading today. It is titled "Assured by God: Living in the Fullness of God's Grace." The book is written by many different authors. I really enjoyed the chapters by Burk Parsons, Al Mohler, J MacArthur, and Jerry Bridges. If you know anyone struggling w/the topic of Biblical assurance of salvation this is a GREAT read. Check out prpbooks.com
Also check out my July book reviews of Spurgeon vs. Hyper-Calvinism: the Battle for Gospel Preaching & The Reformation: How a Monk and a Mallet Changed the World.
So here is the latest update of the stuff i am trying to read outside of Scripture... What have you guys been reading?
Books I am currently reading:
Evangelical Feminism and Biblical Truth (Wayne Grudem)
Girl Talk (By Carolyn Mahaney)
Christian Living Beyond Belief (Cliff McManis)
The Message of the O.T. (by Mark Dever)
What Jesus Demands from the World (by John Piper)
Institutes of the Christian Religion, Vol. 1 (John Calvin) (Book 1, Ch 17)
Numerous Jude commentaries (for sermon preperation/various authors)
Books I’ve finished in the last year or so:
The Reformation (Stephen J. Nichols)
Spurgeon VS Hyper-Calvinism (Iain Murray)
A Scottish Christian Heritage (Iain Murray)
Meetings that Work (A Strauch)
The Truth War (By John MacArthur)
No Place for the Truth (by David F. Wells).
The Cross and Christian Ministry (D.A. Carson).
Women's Ministry in the Local Church (Ligon Duncan/Susan Hunt)
The Holiness of God (by R.C. Sproul)
Growing Up Christian (by Paul Graustein)
How America Lost Her Innocence (By Steve Gallagher)
From Pride to Humility (pamphlet by Dr. Stuart Scott)
Humility: True Greatness (by C.J. Mahaney)
Biblical Eldership (by A. Strauch)
Expository Preaching With Word Pictures (Jack Hughes)
The Reformed Pastor (by Richard Baxter)
Legacy of Sovereign Joy (by John Piper)
Whose Money Is It Anyways (By John MacArthur)
The Treasure Principle (by Randy Alcorn)
Baptist Life and Thought (By William Brackney) I read large sections of this book.
By His Grace and For His Glory (Dr. Nettles) I read portions of this book
Knowing God (J.I. Packer) Through ch 19
Monday, June 18, 2007
Lessons from the Early Church and Acts 2
Much of what is recorded in Acts is historical narrative, describing many (literal) events that happened during the beginning of the Church Age. It is essential that one understands the difference between prescriptive and descriptive passages of Scripture. Failure to heed this warning can lead to many misapplications of the Biblical text. The book of Acts is primarily filled with Descriptive/Narrative passages. We must keep this in mind before me make NORMATIVE certain events in Acts that where not meant to be duplicated. In short then, Acts shows us what authentic Christianity looked like in all of her blessed simplicity. This book provides us with many vivid illustrations of discipleship, evangelism, and Biblical church growth.
Acts 2:41-47 illustrates 4 noteworthy truths:
1. Genuine Salvation precedes biblical baptism (v. 41).
Approximately 3000 people “received the word” and were converted before being “baptized” in Acts 2:41. During the church age, genuine salvation always preceded baptism. Peter commands his listeners to first “repent” and then to be “baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” (Acts 2:38). This seems to be the clear cut teaching that is illustrated for us in verse 41 (among many New Testament passages). The practice of the early church and of the apostles is what many refer to today as “believer’s baptism.”
Many other New Testament texts could be cited to support this point including a number of historical accounts that are recorded in Acts (Acts 8:30-38; Acts 10:44-48; 16:29-34; 18:7-8). Again, these passages demonstrate the consistent practice of the apostles and the early church: people were saved and subsequently they were also baptized. The early church did not have a category for an un-baptized believer. In modern day vernacular, “you got saved and then you got dunked.”
As the second member of the Triune Godhead, Jesus’ word in Matthew 28:19 is sufficient warrant for the baptism of believers. Jesus commanded his followers, “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” The imperative in Matthew 28 is to go and make disciples. Jesus’ clearly teaches us that baptism is only for genuine disciples (literally, baptizing “them”). Jesus and the apostles taught their followers that baptism was a matter of obedience. It is the first step of obedience after a person submits him or herself to the Lordship of Christ at salvation.
Baptism is also about identification; both identification with Christ Himself and identification with the Church (which of course is Christ’s body). Baptism pictures the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ on behalf of the believer, while demonstrating the repentance of faith, and new life the believer has in Christ. Paul asked, "Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death? Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:3-4; Col 2:12).
As we observe our next point (below) we’ll uncover a connection between baptism and one’s personal identification with the local church.
2. Formal identification with a local church appears to have been the normative pattern with the early church. (v. 41)
It appears that the early church clearly knew who belonged to their local assembly. Acts 1:15 says the church of Jerusalem began with “about a hundred and twenty people.” Specific names from this list are provided in verses 13-14.
After Peter’s powerful sermon on the Day of Pentecost many sinners respond to his exhortation. Those people repented and were baptized in the name of the Lord (vv. 41-42). Luke, the author of Acts, records that about “three-thousand” were added to the church. The Greek word for “added” is prostithemi. This word means to add something to an existing quantity. In the words of one teacher it “speaks of a deliberate, calculated act of adding a select number to a greater, existing whole.” Those who were genuinely saved proceeded to be baptized. Those that were baptized were then consequentially added to the early church.
This same verb (prostithemi) is used again (in a different tense) in Acts 2:47. Luke says that “the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved.” The Greek word used to describe this revival (sozo) is a present passive participle. Luke wants his readers to understand that this was a continuous revival. As the gospel was clearly proclaimed the Lord himself was saving sinners on a consistent basis. This, if you will, was the first revival in the history of the church!
In his historical account Luke records that the following sequential events transpired: In Acts 2:41 the Jews first received the words of Peter (conversion); they were then baptized (identification with Jesus); and as a result they were added to the existing number of those whom were already saved in Jerusalem (further identification with the local church). Following conversion formal identification with Christ and the local church in and through the waters of baptism appears to have been the practice of the local church. The three verbs Luke uses in v. 41 are in the aorist tense. These actions are simple facts. This all took place during the beginning days of the church.
Acts 4:4 records the continued spiritual growth that took place during the churches infancy. Acts 4:4 puts it this way, “the number of men grew to about five thousand.” One author commenting on the word ‘number’ writes, “the word here is the word arithmos from which we get ‘arithmetic’-the science of the computation of numbers.”
It seems fair to deduce from passages like these ones that when people repented of their sins they immediately were baptized and thus connected themselves to a local assembly (a church). They were “added” to some type of official church roster. The New Testament epistles do not have a special category for ‘Lone-Ranger’ Christians. As a New Testament saint, you were either part of a local church or you were not. God saved people, and those same people got baptized. Water baptism identified them with both Christ and His church. This was of course a major step of faith for many Jewish Christians, especially during the days of heavy Roman persecution.
The concept of biblical church discipline (Matthew 18 & 1 Cor. 5) as well as church government (Hebrews 13:17, Acts 20:38, Eph. 4:11ff, Titus 1) seems to imply a formal relationship with the local church. As a pastor, I’m amazed at the excuses Christians make today as to why they have not been baptized. I’m also bewildered at the large percentage of baptized believers who aren’t formally identifying themselves with a local assembly (church). Christians who have not been baptized as well as those who do not belong to a local church seem to be at out odds with the New Testament model.
One of the footnote questions that arise from this conversation is as follows: Should baptism be a prerequisite for church membership? Personally, I think one can make a good case that it should be but I don’t know if one can be absolutely dogmatic about this. If you agree with the basic premises I provided above then you’d probably implement this policy into your church constitution. On the other hand, you may argue that hypothetically one could identify him/herself with a local church today, with the intention to be baptized in the immediate future, and still join the church as a “member.”
This concept (namely that baptism is a prerequisite for formal church membership) seems to be inferred in various descriptive passages in Acts but is not directly taught in any New Testament text. I believe the same thing could be said concerning the concept of formal church membership. Should a church be dogmatic about matters that are only implied and/or deduced from the pages of Scripture? What if those examples only come from the book of Acts? I would argue that it’s something that needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis. At the very least, a church should strive to be consistent in polity and practice.
With that said, I need to reiterate my first two points. 1. Genuine salvation precedes biblical baptism. 2. Formal identification with a local church appears to have been the normative pattern with the early church.
If you are a Baptist (i.e. if you believe in Believer’s baptism), i would be interested in your thoughts pertaining to the footnote question listed above. What say you? To be continued…
Acts 2:41-47 illustrates 4 noteworthy truths:
1. Genuine Salvation precedes biblical baptism (v. 41).
Approximately 3000 people “received the word” and were converted before being “baptized” in Acts 2:41. During the church age, genuine salvation always preceded baptism. Peter commands his listeners to first “repent” and then to be “baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” (Acts 2:38). This seems to be the clear cut teaching that is illustrated for us in verse 41 (among many New Testament passages). The practice of the early church and of the apostles is what many refer to today as “believer’s baptism.”
Many other New Testament texts could be cited to support this point including a number of historical accounts that are recorded in Acts (Acts 8:30-38; Acts 10:44-48; 16:29-34; 18:7-8). Again, these passages demonstrate the consistent practice of the apostles and the early church: people were saved and subsequently they were also baptized. The early church did not have a category for an un-baptized believer. In modern day vernacular, “you got saved and then you got dunked.”
As the second member of the Triune Godhead, Jesus’ word in Matthew 28:19 is sufficient warrant for the baptism of believers. Jesus commanded his followers, “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” The imperative in Matthew 28 is to go and make disciples. Jesus’ clearly teaches us that baptism is only for genuine disciples (literally, baptizing “them”). Jesus and the apostles taught their followers that baptism was a matter of obedience. It is the first step of obedience after a person submits him or herself to the Lordship of Christ at salvation.
Baptism is also about identification; both identification with Christ Himself and identification with the Church (which of course is Christ’s body). Baptism pictures the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ on behalf of the believer, while demonstrating the repentance of faith, and new life the believer has in Christ. Paul asked, "Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death? Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:3-4; Col 2:12).
As we observe our next point (below) we’ll uncover a connection between baptism and one’s personal identification with the local church.
2. Formal identification with a local church appears to have been the normative pattern with the early church. (v. 41)
It appears that the early church clearly knew who belonged to their local assembly. Acts 1:15 says the church of Jerusalem began with “about a hundred and twenty people.” Specific names from this list are provided in verses 13-14.
After Peter’s powerful sermon on the Day of Pentecost many sinners respond to his exhortation. Those people repented and were baptized in the name of the Lord (vv. 41-42). Luke, the author of Acts, records that about “three-thousand” were added to the church. The Greek word for “added” is prostithemi. This word means to add something to an existing quantity. In the words of one teacher it “speaks of a deliberate, calculated act of adding a select number to a greater, existing whole.” Those who were genuinely saved proceeded to be baptized. Those that were baptized were then consequentially added to the early church.
This same verb (prostithemi) is used again (in a different tense) in Acts 2:47. Luke says that “the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved.” The Greek word used to describe this revival (sozo) is a present passive participle. Luke wants his readers to understand that this was a continuous revival. As the gospel was clearly proclaimed the Lord himself was saving sinners on a consistent basis. This, if you will, was the first revival in the history of the church!
In his historical account Luke records that the following sequential events transpired: In Acts 2:41 the Jews first received the words of Peter (conversion); they were then baptized (identification with Jesus); and as a result they were added to the existing number of those whom were already saved in Jerusalem (further identification with the local church). Following conversion formal identification with Christ and the local church in and through the waters of baptism appears to have been the practice of the local church. The three verbs Luke uses in v. 41 are in the aorist tense. These actions are simple facts. This all took place during the beginning days of the church.
Acts 4:4 records the continued spiritual growth that took place during the churches infancy. Acts 4:4 puts it this way, “the number of men grew to about five thousand.” One author commenting on the word ‘number’ writes, “the word here is the word arithmos from which we get ‘arithmetic’-the science of the computation of numbers.”
It seems fair to deduce from passages like these ones that when people repented of their sins they immediately were baptized and thus connected themselves to a local assembly (a church). They were “added” to some type of official church roster. The New Testament epistles do not have a special category for ‘Lone-Ranger’ Christians. As a New Testament saint, you were either part of a local church or you were not. God saved people, and those same people got baptized. Water baptism identified them with both Christ and His church. This was of course a major step of faith for many Jewish Christians, especially during the days of heavy Roman persecution.
The concept of biblical church discipline (Matthew 18 & 1 Cor. 5) as well as church government (Hebrews 13:17, Acts 20:38, Eph. 4:11ff, Titus 1) seems to imply a formal relationship with the local church. As a pastor, I’m amazed at the excuses Christians make today as to why they have not been baptized. I’m also bewildered at the large percentage of baptized believers who aren’t formally identifying themselves with a local assembly (church). Christians who have not been baptized as well as those who do not belong to a local church seem to be at out odds with the New Testament model.
One of the footnote questions that arise from this conversation is as follows: Should baptism be a prerequisite for church membership? Personally, I think one can make a good case that it should be but I don’t know if one can be absolutely dogmatic about this. If you agree with the basic premises I provided above then you’d probably implement this policy into your church constitution. On the other hand, you may argue that hypothetically one could identify him/herself with a local church today, with the intention to be baptized in the immediate future, and still join the church as a “member.”
This concept (namely that baptism is a prerequisite for formal church membership) seems to be inferred in various descriptive passages in Acts but is not directly taught in any New Testament text. I believe the same thing could be said concerning the concept of formal church membership. Should a church be dogmatic about matters that are only implied and/or deduced from the pages of Scripture? What if those examples only come from the book of Acts? I would argue that it’s something that needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis. At the very least, a church should strive to be consistent in polity and practice.
With that said, I need to reiterate my first two points. 1. Genuine salvation precedes biblical baptism. 2. Formal identification with a local church appears to have been the normative pattern with the early church.
If you are a Baptist (i.e. if you believe in Believer’s baptism), i would be interested in your thoughts pertaining to the footnote question listed above. What say you? To be continued…
Monday, June 11, 2007
Too busy to blog
When i get super busy this is one of the things that has to go... I do enjoy blogging and reading good theological blogs but i know it is not priority #1 for me. It's a busy season in the life of the church so please forgive me for not posting anything of substance in forever.
Have a wonderful week!
I found this insightful post on EVAN ALMIGHTY at http://www.reformedgeek.com/
"I knew the “church” had been duped into supporting Evan Almighty (the sequel to Bruce Almighty) by the way Christian bands had agreed to perform at the opening of the movie (post).
Now with around two weeks to go until the movie opens, the producers of the movie are really hitting the evangelical market hard. Thanks to Christianity Today, we have their latest cover being a four-page spread (front and back covers, inside and out) promoting the movie.
My deep frustration is why the “church” goes to so much effort to avoid the Biblical gospel. They will jump onto the latest bandwagon, with programs, movies etc, with so much zeal and confidence, except when it comes to 'Repent and believe…'" see link above for full story
Have a wonderful week!
I found this insightful post on EVAN ALMIGHTY at http://www.reformedgeek.com/
"I knew the “church” had been duped into supporting Evan Almighty (the sequel to Bruce Almighty) by the way Christian bands had agreed to perform at the opening of the movie (post).
Now with around two weeks to go until the movie opens, the producers of the movie are really hitting the evangelical market hard. Thanks to Christianity Today, we have their latest cover being a four-page spread (front and back covers, inside and out) promoting the movie.
My deep frustration is why the “church” goes to so much effort to avoid the Biblical gospel. They will jump onto the latest bandwagon, with programs, movies etc, with so much zeal and confidence, except when it comes to 'Repent and believe…'" see link above for full story
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)